My pipeline is dry

The signals that mean a buyer is actually in market

Buyer intent signals that matter in B2B

Table of Contents

Stuck at the same ARR?

We’ll show you why, free.

In Short

Gartner found buyers spend just 17% of the purchase process meeting suppliers, so the signals you can observe are a thin slice of something happening mostly out of view. Most of what gets sold as intent is activity, and the same behaviour has a dozen explanations.

  1. A new name on the thread is the strongest signal, because it cost your contact something.
  2. Implementation questions come from people picturing it working. Feature questions can be curiosity.
  3. Searches for buyer intent data fell 47% last year, B2B intent data 58%.
  4. The signal nobody tracks: whether your contact has told anyone else internally.

Someone downloaded your pricing guide. Your tool scored them as high intent and an alert went to a rep.

They were probably a competitor, a student, or somebody who wanted the number without talking to anyone. None of those is a buyer.

That is the intent problem. Most of what gets sold as a buying signal is activity, and activity is easy to measure and mostly meaningless.

Why most intent data misleads

Intent tooling sells observation. Someone from a target account visited three pages. True, and not something you can act on.

The same behaviour has a dozen explanations. Research for a project six months out. A junior analyst building a market map. Someone checking what their current vendor charges. All identical on a dashboard.

The structural reason it is getting harder

Gartner’s 2024 B2B Buying Survey found buyers spend just 17% of the purchase process meeting suppliers, and 75% say they prefer a rep-free buying experience. Roughly 80% of the journey is self-directed, which means the signals you can observe are a thin slice of a process happening mostly out of view.

The market is quietly losing confidence

Searches for buyer intent data have fallen 47% in the last year, and B2B intent data is down 58%. The question has not become less important. Confidence in the tooling has.

Buyer intent signals that actually mean something

Roughly strongest to weakest. Each one has a reason it works and a specific response.

1. Someone new joins the conversation

Why it works

Your contact spent internal credibility introducing you to a colleague. Nobody does that for a vendor they are idly researching. Given that Gartner puts a complex buying group at six to ten people, each new name is also a real step toward the committee actually deciding.

What to do

Find out what the new person blocks on before the next call. They have different objections from your original contact and nobody has asked them yet. Our post on selling to six people breaks down what each role in the room cares about.

2. A question about implementation or migration

Why it works

How long does setup take. What happens to our existing data. Who needs to be involved. These only matter to someone picturing the thing working. Feature questions can be curiosity. Implementation questions rarely are.

What to do

Answer it properly, then offer the next step in the same breath. This is the moment a call converts, and most reps answer the question and stop there.

3. A request for something they only need internally

Why it works

A security document, a one-page summary, pricing in a forwardable format. They are not asking for themselves. They are assembling material to convince someone else, which means the evaluation has left their desk.

What to do

Send it in a form they can forward without editing. You are writing for the person who was not on the call.

4. Timeline language turns specific

Why it works

Sometime next year becomes before the end of the quarter. Vague timelines describe a problem they are tolerating. Dated ones usually mean a deadline someone else set, and that deadline does your selling for you.

What to do

Ask what happens on that date. A real consequence means a real deal. No consequence means the date is aspiration.

5. A competitor gets named

Why it works

It confirms an active evaluation rather than research. Weaker than the others because it also confirms you are not alone in it.

What to do

Ask what they like about the alternative before defending against it. The answer tells you which criteria are actually being used.

Signals that mean nothing

It might hit hard, but these are a few intent signals from prospects that mean nothing.

  1. Content downloads. The most reported and least predictive thing in B2B marketing. People download to avoid a conversation, not to start one.
  2. Webinar attendance. Measures interest in a topic. Your product is not the topic.
  3. Repeat visits from one person. Without a second person involved this is research, and research can continue for a year without going anywhere.
  4. Social engagement. Costs nothing to give and means roughly that much.

None are worthless as marketing metrics. They are worthless as reasons to put a deal in your forecast, which is how a pipeline ends up full while revenue stays flat.

The intent signal nobody tracks

Whether your contact has told anyone else.

A deal moves when the evaluation stops being one person’s curiosity and becomes their project. At that point they have attached their name to it internally and the cost of abandoning it rises. With committees now averaging six to ten people, this is the moment the process actually starts.

No tool measures it. You have to ask, and the question is simple. Who else needs to see this before you decide. The answer tells you whether you have a deal or a reader.

Build a flag, not a score

The practical version of all this is a short list of behaviours your CRM flags to a human, rather than a numeric score.

A score tells you someone is warm. A flag tells you what to do next, and only one of those closes anything. Worth noting too that these signals are about buyers arriving, not leaving. The early warnings that a customer is on their way out look completely different, and we covered those separately.

Common questions

Buyer intent signals are behaviours indicating someone is actively evaluating a purchase rather than researching generally. The reliable ones involve other people joining the process or the buyer preparing to justify the decision internally.

A new person joining the conversation is strongest, because your contact spent internal credibility to make it happen. Implementation questions and requests for forwardable material follow closely, since both indicate the evaluation has moved beyond one desk.

It depends what you do with it. Intent data shows anonymous account-level activity, which is a starting point rather than an answer. Searches for buyer intent data have fallen 47% year on year, which suggests buyers are finding the outputs harder to act on than expected.

Because downloading is a way to avoid talking to someone. Competitors, students and people comparing prices download at the same rate as buyers, and nothing in the action distinguishes them.

Ask who else needs to see it before they decide. If the answer names people and a process, the evaluation is real. If they are still the only person involved, you have interest rather than a deal.

Why is pipeline full, but revenue isn't for your B2B SaaS
Lead count is a comfort metric. Why full pipelines produce flat revenue, and what to measure instead.
  • 6 minutes reAD
Long-form vs short-form content in SaaS marketing
From awareness to decision-making, this article explains how content length influences trust, education, and buying confidence.
  • 7 minutes reAD
SaaS events aren’t one-size-fits-all. Discover how founders and CMOs are using trade shows and self‑hosted formats to fuel brand and pipeline growth.
  • 11 minutes reAD

Read it before your competitors do.

Reading is one thing. Fixing is another.

If something you read here sounds like your business, get on a call. We will show you exactly what to do about it.
3 new clients a quarter. That is all we take.

3 in 4

Clients come back for more

11 weeks

From stuck to a working revenue system